This post narrowly discusses Cisco VPN connectivity for Windows RT thats. .
For the rest of the items (and to use VPN as the example) all they had to do was "Ok, here is a way for power users to change the executable signing requirement.
Cisco, just provide these users with a version of your VPN client recompiled for ARM".
Ability to join AD, uSB Ethernet capability, outlook.It is a political issue.For example, things I know customers have asked for (just off the top of my head VPN, java, third-party browsers, ability to run third other party desktop apps.Windows RT clearly states that wwe raw 2003 game pc you can only use apps that are available from the windows store.I am not addressing anything else other than that because I dont know the details of anything about other solutions like SSL VPNs or Citrix Access Gateway, vogue knitting the ultimate knitting book Netscalar, etc. .No Group Name option.
Windows never natively supported the IPSec Identifier, or Group Name feature in Cisco VPNs, which I argue would be the vast majority of real use cases.
A promising slide from TechEd 2012 promises VPN support for Cisco VPNs: And from here : The TechEd 2012 session Windows 8: Windows RT Devices for Business ( m/ ) stated at the 26 min mark that Microsoft incorporate the Cisco VPN client into Windows.
IOS.1.4, pPTP, l2TP / IPSec with PSK, l2TP / IPSec with Cert.I understand AD is more of a Windows Pro feature, and since RT is more like Windows home, that is the only one on my short list above that I understand not being available.This is the response I got: There is a standard VPN client included in Windows RT that is capable of connecting to the Cisco VPN server. .It doesnt work for most Cisco VPN setups where the IT department has decided to use PSK authentication.Originally Posted by theseusperse, it's already possible, I've connected to my home PC using my own VPN from work using the old style desktop side Internet Explorer within Windows 8 RT on the surface.Sorry, but that is not a good customer service response.The fact that Juniper is mentioned is a consequence of the response I got alone.